Insolvenzverwalter Bewertungen & Top Anbieter in Köln

Heinrich D auf

Google

freundlich und kompetent!

Former R auf

Google

🚨Update 2026 June<br>Reckless, low-quality work from GÖRG in case 7 O 124/26. (Look attachment)<br><br>The Berlin Regional Court II issued a devastating critique against this law firm (jurisdiction based in Cologne), ruling that their lawsuit completely lacks "conclusiveness" (fehlende Schlussigkeit).<br><br>Under German civil procedure, this is the ultimate structural Failure. It means even if the court assumes every single factual claim GÖRG made is 100% true, the law still gives them zero right to a remedy. The judge bypassed evaluating evidence entirely and formally suggested they withdraw the case to avoid a total, humiliating dismissal.<br>As a Chinese individual and non German resident, I explicitly warned GÖRG‘s client not to engage in this meritless cross-border litigation. I urged them to settle for the good together with their public fund client of Brandenburg: Technische Hochschule Wildau. Instead, they acted recklessly, ignoring binding Higher Regional Court (OLG Hamburg) precedent and wasting public resources on a structurally dead claim. Filing an inconclusive lawsuit is a textbook indicator of sloppy legal engineering and incompetent lawyering. The good question is how a law firm receives such extreme criticism from a court can still receive the trust from a German public state linked institution..<br><br>2025:<br>Görg presents itself publicly as a modern, responsible law firm committed to ESG principles and diversity. Unfortunately, as minority resident in the European Community- my personal experience shows a Very Different Reality.<br><br>On behalf of one of their EU fund beneficiary German university client, Görg initiated multiple lawsuits against me in Germany. But the latest three were dismissed after I referred that Görg legal actions were illegal under EU Laws, and Hamburg courts recognized them as meritless. These cases had no substance but served as classic SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) tactics — designed to pressure and silence critics rather than resolve genuine legal disputes.<br><br>For a German law firm that markets ESG values, promoting diversity and fairness, this contradiction is glaring. Instead of upholding fundamental rights, Görg has shown how easily such principles can be set aside when powerful clients demand aggressive litigation strategies.<br><br>If Görg truly cares about ESG and responsible practice, it should reflect on whether pursuing meritless SLAPP actions aligns with the values it advertises. For now, the gap between the marketing and the reality is deeply disappointing.